Lazard vs TPG
LAZ and TPG side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LAZ and TPG compare
TPG is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as Lazard ($17.9B against $4.2B).
TPG grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.1% versus 5.6% for Lazard).
Lazard keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.9% compared with 4.7% at TPG.
Both pay dividends: Lazard yields 5.2% and TPG 4.8%.
Lazard scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for TPG), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LAZ | TPG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.2B | $17.9B |
| Share price | $38.35 | $46.68 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.9% | −16.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.0% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.41 | 1.60 |
| Employees | 3,309 | 1,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.8× | – |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | 4.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 6.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 15.5% | – |
| Fair value | $37.77 | $29.11 |
| Margin of safety | −1.5% (better) | −60.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% | 30.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.8% | 17.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −26.8% | 279% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −29.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −9.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 9.3% | – |
| Net margin | 6.9% (better) | 4.7% |
| FCF margin | 19.9% | – |
| Return on equity | 27.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.4× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.23 (better) | 1.37 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.2% (better) | 4.8% |
| Payout ratio | 84.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.6% (better) | 4.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.9% | 37.8% |
| Held by insiders | 4.9% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.7M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.3% | – |
Go deeper
- LAZ stock overview
- LAZ income statement
- LAZ valuation and score
- TPG stock overview
- TPG income statement
- TPG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.