StockData

Lanvin vs Neo-Concept International

LANV and NCI side by side, both in apparel and other finished products made from fabrics and similar materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LANV and NCI compare

Lanvin grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−17.6% versus −41.8% for Neo-Concept International).

Neo-Concept International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.24% compared with −99.2% at Lanvin.

Neo-Concept International scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 0 for Lanvin), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLANVNCI
Size and price
Share price$0.720$5.81
Change, 1 year−64.5%−35.4%
Change, 5 years−92.6%−99.9%
Beta (5Y)−0.02–
Employees2,066–
StockData Score
Total score06 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−17.6% (better)−41.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average1.6%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−95.9%
EPS growth (TTM)–−96.1%
Profitability
Gross margin58.2% (better)36.9%
Operating margin−96.3%1.3% (better)
Net margin−99.2%0.24% (better)
FCF margin–12.7%
Return on equity–0.41%
Return on invested capital−42.6%1.1% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Net debt / EBITDA–−5.59
Interest coverage−6.5×–
Current ratio0.204.29 (better)
Piotroski F-score36 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions–3.1%
Held by insiders72.4%74.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.