Gladstone Land vs Alpine Income Property Trust
LAND and PINE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LAND and PINE compare
Gladstone Land and Alpine Income Property Trust are about the same size, with market caps of $320M and $289M.
Alpine Income Property Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus 21.6% for Gladstone Land).
Alpine Income Property Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with −7.3% at Gladstone Land.
Both pay dividends: Gladstone Land yields 7.6% and Alpine Income Property Trust 7.4%.
Alpine Income Property Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Gladstone Land), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LAND | PINE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $320M | $289M |
| Share price | $7.41 | $16.39 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.7% | 13.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.1% | −12.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 0.44 |
| Employees | 75 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 86.3× |
| P/S | 3.6× (better) | 4.1× |
| P/B | 0.5× (better) | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.0× |
| Fair value | $9.63 | $17.14 |
| Margin of safety | 23.1% (better) | 4.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.6% | 24.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.1% | 25.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −183% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 33.9% |
| Net margin | −7.3% | 9.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.96% | 2.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 1.4× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.44 | 0.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.6% (better) | 7.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 303% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 6.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.6% (better) | 7.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 40.5% | 60.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 7.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$261K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- LAND stock overview
- LAND income statement
- LAND valuation and score
- PINE stock overview
- PINE income statement
- PINE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.