Gladstone Land vs Net Lease Office Properties
LAND and NLOP side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LAND and NLOP compare
Gladstone Land is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Net Lease Office Properties ($320M against $133M).
Gladstone Land grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.6% versus −35.4% for Net Lease Office Properties).
Gladstone Land keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.3% compared with −59.8% at Net Lease Office Properties.
Both pay dividends: Gladstone Land yields 7.6% and Net Lease Office Properties 215%.
Gladstone Land scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Net Lease Office Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LAND | NLOP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $320M | $133M |
| Share price | $7.41 | $8.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.7% | −68.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.1% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 0.05 |
| Employees | 75 | 197 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 3.6× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 0.5× (better) | 0.8× |
| Fair value | $9.63 | $15.25 |
| Margin of safety | 23.1% | 41.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.6% (better) | −35.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −183% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | −7.3% (better) | −59.8% |
| Return on equity | −0.96% (better) | −13.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.44 | 2.78 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.6% | 215% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Shareholder yield | 7.6% | 215% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 40.5% | 56.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 5.0% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.0% |
Go deeper
- LAND stock overview
- LAND income statement
- LAND valuation and score
- NLOP stock overview
- NLOP income statement
- NLOP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.