Sealsq vs POET Technologies
LAES and POET side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LAES and POET compare
POET Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2495% versus −99.8% for Sealsq).
POET Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Sealsq), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LAES | POET |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.25 | $5.13 |
| Change, 1 year | −76.6% | 1.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −32.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.79 | 1.39 |
| Employees | 185 | 1 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −99.8% | 2495% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −71.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34520% | – |
| Operating margin | −159196% | – |
| Net margin | −136776% | – |
| FCF margin | −128000% | −3102% (better) |
| Return on equity | −10.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −97.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | −593.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 14.43 (better) | 2.19 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.4% | 26.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.80% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.2M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 17.4% |
Go deeper
- LAES stock overview
- LAES income statement
- LAES valuation and score
- POET stock overview
- POET income statement
- POET valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.