Kratos Defense & Security Solutions vs Voyager Technologies
KTOS and VOYG side by side, both in transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KTOS and VOYG compare
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Voyager Technologies ($6.4B against $1.7B).
Voyager Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.8% versus 28.2% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions).
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.3% compared with −79.0% at Voyager Technologies.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 2 for Voyager Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KTOS | VOYG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.4B | $1.7B |
| Share price | $33.91 | $27.04 |
| Change, 1 year | −55.8% | 18.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 67.7% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 3.58 |
| Employees | 4,300 | 800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 283× | – |
| P/S | 3.9× (better) | 7.4× |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 5.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 59.6× | – |
| FCF yield | −1.9% (better) | −17.7% |
| Fair value | $26.24 | $6.41 |
| Margin of safety | −29.2% (better) | −322% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.2% | 41.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.5% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 10.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.00% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −28.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.0% (better) | 10.4% |
| Operating margin | 0.39% (better) | −86.0% |
| Net margin | 1.3% (better) | −79.0% |
| FCF margin | −7.5% (better) | −131% |
| Return on equity | 0.81% (better) | −38.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 0.24% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −23.8× |
| Current ratio | 5.42 (better) | 2.93 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.94 (better) | 0.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −21.2% | 0.00% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −21.2% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.7% | 72.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 12.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$131M | −$8.6M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 24.8% |
Go deeper
- KTOS stock overview
- KTOS income statement
- KTOS valuation and score
- VOYG stock overview
- VOYG income statement
- VOYG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.