Kontoor Brands vs Ralph Lauren
KTB and RL side by side, both in apparel and other finished products made from fabrics and similar materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KTB and RL compare
Ralph Lauren is the larger company, worth 5.8 times as much as Kontoor Brands ($23.4B against $4.1B).
On earnings, Kontoor Brands is cheaper: it trades at 15.5× trailing earnings, against 24.8× for Ralph Lauren.
Kontoor Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (34.3% versus 14.7% for Ralph Lauren).
Ralph Lauren keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.8% compared with 8.7% at Kontoor Brands.
Both pay dividends: Kontoor Brands yields 2.9% and Ralph Lauren 0.97%.
Kontoor Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 16 for Ralph Lauren), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KTB | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $23.4B |
| Share price | $74.25 | $392.87 |
| Change, 1 year | −8.4% | 19.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.5% | 208% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 11K | 24K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 16 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.5× (better) | 24.8× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 6.6× (better) | 8.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.2× (better) | 15.3× |
| P/FCF | 9.6× | – |
| PEG | – | 0.96 |
| FCF yield | 10.4% | – |
| Fair value | $67.84 | $253.76 |
| Margin of safety | −9.5% (better) | −54.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 34.3% (better) | 14.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% | 13.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.6% | 23.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 26.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 48.2% | 70.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.9% | 14.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.7% | 11.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 13.8% | – |
| Return on equity | 48.0% (better) | 37.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 15.8% | 50.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.85 | 0.46 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.58 (better) | −0.47 |
| Interest coverage | 5.2× | 22.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.83 | 2.04 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.18 | 6.34 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% (better) | 0.97% |
| Payout ratio | 43.6% | 22.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 16.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.5% | 2.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% (better) | 3.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 65.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 57.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$31.9M (better) | −$124M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.0% | 9.1% |
Go deeper
- KTB stock overview
- KTB income statement
- KTB valuation and score
- RL stock overview
- RL income statement
- RL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.