Karat Packaging vs Ranpak
KRT and PACK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KRT and PACK compare
Karat Packaging is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Ranpak ($732M against $305M).
Karat Packaging grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.0% versus 8.3% for Ranpak).
Karat Packaging keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with −8.3% at Ranpak.
Karat Packaging pays a dividend yielding 5.0%; Ranpak does not pay one.
Karat Packaging scores higher on the StockData Score (24 against 6 for Ranpak), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KRT | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $732M | $305M |
| Share price | $36.75 | $3.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 66.2% | −29.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 75.0% | −91.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 2.02 |
| Employees | 696 | 800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 24 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.6× | – |
| P/S | 1.5× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 4.5× | 0.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× (better) | 14.9× |
| P/FCF | 11.4× | – |
| PEG | 1.65 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.8% | – |
| Fair value | $44.98 | $4.17 |
| Margin of safety | 18.3% (better) | 14.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.0% (better) | 8.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.6% (better) | 5.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 56.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 57.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 6.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.3% (better) | 33.8% |
| Operating margin | 11.8% (better) | −1.7% |
| Net margin | 9.4% (better) | −8.3% |
| FCF margin | 12.8% | – |
| Return on equity | 29.8% (better) | −6.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 33.0% (better) | −0.64% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.14 (better) | 0.79 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.29 | 8.01 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 34.1× (better) | −0.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.83 (better) | 1.79 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.22 (better) | 0.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 76.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 114% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 35.7% | 89.9% |
| Held by insiders | 57.4% | 45.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$593K | −$18.7K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.8% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- KRT stock overview
- KRT income statement
- KRT valuation and score
- PACK stock overview
- PACK income statement
- PACK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.