Kornit Digital vs Nano Dimension
KRNT and NNDM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KRNT and NNDM compare
Kornit Digital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.5% compared with −118% at Nano Dimension.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KRNT | NNDM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $16.79 | $1.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.4% | −21.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −90.5% | −74.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.13 | 1.03 |
| Employees | 633 | 468 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.1% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.5% | 97.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.3% (better) | 42.2% |
| Operating margin | −16.6% (better) | −117% |
| Net margin | −6.5% (better) | −118% |
| FCF margin | 1.6% (better) | −53.8% |
| Return on equity | −1.9% (better) | −17.3% |
| Return on invested capital | −5.0% (better) | −21.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −450.4× |
| Current ratio | 14.18 (better) | 7.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.8% | 31.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.45% | 41.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.6% | – |
Go deeper
- KRNT stock overview
- KRNT income statement
- KRNT valuation and score
- NNDM stock overview
- NNDM income statement
- NNDM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.