Karman vs Loar
KRMN and LOAR side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KRMN and LOAR compare
Loar is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Karman ($7.4B against $5.9B).
Karman grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.3% versus 33.8% for Loar).
Loar keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with 7.5% at Karman.
Karman scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Loar), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KRMN | LOAR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.9B | $7.4B |
| Share price | $44.69 | $79.24 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.2% | 2.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.54 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 1,400 | 1,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 115× | – |
| P/S | 8.8× (better) | 11.7× |
| P/B | 13.4× | 6.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 39.5× (better) | 56.5× |
| FCF yield | −0.13% | – |
| Fair value | $12.60 | $40.58 |
| Margin of safety | −255% | −95.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 56.3% (better) | 33.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 345% (better) | −5.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 388% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.1% | 52.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 16.3% | 22.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.5% | 9.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.1% | – |
| Return on equity | 12.4% (better) | 5.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.3% (better) | 6.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.94 | 0.78 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.65 (better) | 5.43 |
| Interest coverage | 1.9× | 2.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.10 | 5.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.85 | 4.64 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −0.03% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −0.03% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.8% | 94.7% |
| Held by insiders | 62.2% | 77.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.2M | $12.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 38.6% | 35.3% |
Go deeper
- KRMN stock overview
- KRMN income statement
- KRMN valuation and score
- LOAR stock overview
- LOAR income statement
- LOAR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.