Kite Realty Group Trust vs Phillips Edison &
KRG and PECO side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KRG and PECO compare
Kite Realty Group Trust and Phillips Edison & are about the same size, with market caps of $5.0B and $5.0B.
On earnings, Kite Realty Group Trust is cheaper: it trades at 15.5× trailing earnings, against 35.0× for Phillips Edison &.
Phillips Edison & grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus −7.0% for Kite Realty Group Trust).
Kite Realty Group Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 42.9% compared with 19.1% at Phillips Edison &.
Both pay dividends: Kite Realty Group Trust yields 5.2% and Phillips Edison & 3.4%.
Phillips Edison & scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Kite Realty Group Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KRG | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.0B | $5.0B |
| Share price | $25.07 | $38.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.7% | 14.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.4% | 15.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 0.42 |
| Employees | 228 | 320 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.5× (better) | 35.0× |
| P/S | 6.3× (better) | 6.7× |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 2.1× |
| PEG | – | 1.23 |
| Fair value | $21.09 | $43.05 |
| Margin of safety | −18.9% | 9.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.0% | 8.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.9% (better) | 7.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 144% (better) | 109% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 153% (better) | 109% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 77.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 42.9% (better) | 19.1% |
| Return on equity | 11.5% (better) | 6.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.72 | 0.86 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.2% (better) | 3.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 113% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.7% | 16.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.03% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% (better) | 3.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 89.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.87% | 0.67% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$363K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- KRG stock overview
- KRG income statement
- KRG valuation and score
- PECO stock overview
- PECO income statement
- PECO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.