Katapult vs Sezzle
KPLT and SEZL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KPLT and SEZL compare
Sezzle is the larger company, worth 88 times as much as Katapult ($4.5B against $51.6M).
On earnings, Katapult is cheaper: it trades at 7.4× trailing earnings, against 29.6× for Sezzle.
Sezzle grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.1% versus 13.0% for Katapult).
Sezzle keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.4% compared with 5.4% at Katapult.
Sezzle scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Katapult), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KPLT | SEZL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $51.6M | $4.5B |
| Share price | $10.38 | $134.85 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.7% | 91.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −90.3% | 21766% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.68 | −0.83 |
| Employees | 87 | 201 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.4× (better) | 29.6× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 8.5× |
| P/B | – | 19.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.2× (better) | 20.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.5× |
| FCF yield | −5.1% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $103.02 |
| Margin of safety | – | −30.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.0% | 43.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.4% | 50.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 54.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 56.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 40.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.4% | 30.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.87% | 51.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 88.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 211% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 0.2× | 15.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.90 | 4.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.23 | 15.92 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 35.4% | 44.1% |
| Held by insiders | – | 45.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.5K (better) | −$26.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 22.9% |
Go deeper
- KPLT stock overview
- KPLT income statement
- KPLT valuation and score
- SEZL stock overview
- SEZL income statement
- SEZL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.