Koppers vs UFP Industries
KOP and UFPI side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KOP and UFPI compare
UFP Industries is the larger company, worth 7.4 times as much as Koppers ($4.4B against $589M).
UFP Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.71% versus −0.85% for Koppers).
UFP Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −5.0% at Koppers.
Both pay dividends: Koppers yields 1.1% and UFP Industries 1.8%.
UFP Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Koppers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KOP | UFPI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $589M | $4.4B |
| Share price | $31.16 | $79.49 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.1% | −12.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −3.6% | −10.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.07 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 971 | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.3× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 1.5× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 123× | 13.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 4.9× (better) | 22.5× |
| FCF yield | 20.4% (better) | 4.4% |
| Fair value | $57.44 | $83.94 |
| Margin of safety | 45.8% (better) | 5.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.85% | −0.71% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | 4.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −696% | −28.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −736% | −23.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −13.7% | 4.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.3% (better) | 15.4% |
| Operating margin | −3.3% | 4.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.0% | 3.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.3% (better) | 3.0% |
| Return on equity | −20.3% | 7.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −3.8% | 8.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.21 | 0.08 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 72.26 (better) | −1.65 |
| Interest coverage | −1.1× | 29.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.37 | 3.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.86 | 5.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 1.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 34.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 22.9% |
| Buyback yield | 9.1% (better) | 7.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 10.2% (better) | 9.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 88.5% |
| Held by insiders | 11.2% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.6M | −$1.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.3% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- KOP stock overview
- KOP income statement
- KOP valuation and score
- UFPI stock overview
- UFPI income statement
- UFPI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.