Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV vs PepsiCo
KOF and PEP side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KOF and PEP compare
PepsiCo grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.4% versus 4.3% for Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV).
PepsiCo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 8.2% at Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV.
PepsiCo pays a dividend yielding 4.2%; Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV does not pay one.
PepsiCo scores higher on the StockData Score (24 against 7 for Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KOF | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $187B |
| Share price | $115.68 | $137.34 |
| Change, 1 year | 34.8% | −6.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 112% | −17.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 90K | 306K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 24 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.3× |
| P/S | – | 1.9× |
| P/B | – | 8.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 5.6% |
| Fair value | – | $196.16 |
| Margin of safety | – | 30.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.3% | 6.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.7% (better) | 5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 0.49% | 50.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.71% | 51.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.4% (better) | 3.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.6% | 54.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 15.3% |
| Net margin | 8.2% | 11.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.1% | 10.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 16.5% | 52.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 18.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.55 (better) | 2.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.87 (better) | 2.18 |
| Interest coverage | – | 13.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.12 (better) | 0.94 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.2% |
| Payout ratio | 66.0% | 72.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 6.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.53% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 4.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.11% | 79.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.15% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$6.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- KOF stock overview
- KOF income statement
- KOF valuation and score
- PEP stock overview
- PEP income statement
- PEP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.