Coca Cola vs Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV
KO and KOF side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KO and KOF compare
Coca Cola grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.5% versus 4.3% for Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV).
Coca Cola keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.6% compared with 8.2% at Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV.
Coca Cola pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV does not pay one.
Coca Cola scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 7 for Coca Cola FEMSA SAB de CV), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KO | KOF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $405B | – |
| Share price | $94.08 | $115.68 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.6% | 34.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 65.5% | 112% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.33 | 0.41 |
| Employees | 70K | 90K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.3× | – |
| P/S | 8.1× | – |
| P/B | 11.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 27.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 28.3× | – |
| PEG | 2.45 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | – |
| Fair value | $73.10 | – |
| Margin of safety | −28.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.5% (better) | 4.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 9.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 17.5% (better) | 0.49% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.1% (better) | 0.71% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.2% | 18.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.9% (better) | 45.6% |
| Operating margin | 29.6% | – |
| Net margin | 28.6% (better) | 8.2% |
| FCF margin | 28.5% (better) | 3.1% |
| Return on equity | 44.2% (better) | 16.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.20 | 0.55 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.89 | 0.87 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 9.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.30 (better) | 1.12 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.59 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 77.2% | 66.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.15% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.3% | 0.11% |
| Held by insiders | 0.22% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$255M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.2% | – |
Go deeper
- KO stock overview
- KO income statement
- KO valuation and score
- KOF stock overview
- KOF income statement
- KOF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.