StockData

Knife River vs Teck Resources

KNF and TECK side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How KNF and TECK compare

Teck Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.7% versus 12.1% for Knife River).

Teck Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.0% compared with 4.2% at Knife River.

Knife River scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Teck Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricKNFTECK
Size and price
Market cap$3.3B–
Share price$57.50$60.61
Change, 1 year−5.2%37.9%
Change, 5 years–124%
Beta (5Y)1.061.08
Employees5,298–
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)8
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score22
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E23.5×–
P/S1.0×–
P/B2.0×–
EV/EBITDA9.9×–
P/FCF75.8×–
PEG2.25–
FCF yield1.3%–
Fair value$57.88–
Margin of safety0.65%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)12.1%18.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–3.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−8.7%245% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−8.9%263% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin17.8%24.7% (better)
Operating margin8.3%20.9% (better)
Net margin4.2%13.0% (better)
FCF margin1.3% (better)−3.3%
Return on equity9.1% (better)5.5%
Return on invested capital6.8% (better)6.2%
Financial health
Debt / equity1.010.16 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA3.23 (better)−0.28
Interest coverage3.1× (better)2.5×
Current ratio2.66 (better)2.54
Altman Z-score2.33–
Piotroski F-score38 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions96.7%70.1%
Held by insiders0.70%0.00%
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float7.9%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.