Knife River vs Martin Marietta Materials
KNF and MLM side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KNF and MLM compare
Martin Marietta Materials is the larger company, worth 9.9 times as much as Knife River ($32.5B against $3.3B).
On earnings, Martin Marietta Materials is cheaper: it trades at 13.3× trailing earnings, against 23.5× for Knife River.
Martin Marietta Materials grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.8% versus 12.1% for Knife River).
Martin Marietta Materials keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 36.7% compared with 4.2% at Knife River.
Martin Marietta Materials pays a dividend yielding 0.62%; Knife River does not pay one.
Martin Marietta Materials scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 11 for Knife River), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KNF | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $32.5B |
| Share price | $57.50 | $540.41 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.2% | −12.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 31.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 5,298 | 9,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.5× | 13.3× (better) |
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 4.9× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 2.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.9× (better) | 18.5× |
| P/FCF | 75.8× | 40.1× (better) |
| PEG | 2.25 | 1.25 (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.3% | 2.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $57.88 | $643.33 |
| Margin of safety | 0.65% | 16.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.1% | 14.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 5.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −8.7% | 123% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −8.9% | 126% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.8% | 28.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | 20.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.2% | 36.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.3% | 12.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.1% | 23.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% | 6.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.01 | 0.52 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.23 | 2.82 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.1× | 5.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.66 (better) | 1.41 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.33 | 3.08 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.62% |
| Payout ratio | – | 8.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.62% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.7% | 98.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.70% | 19.1% |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.9% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- KNF stock overview
- KNF income statement
- KNF valuation and score
- MLM stock overview
- MLM income statement
- MLM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.