KLX Energy Services vs RPC
KLXE and RES side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KLXE and RES compare
RPC is the larger company, worth 47 times as much as KLX Energy Services ($1.3B against $27.2M).
RPC grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.8% versus 1.4% for KLX Energy Services).
RPC keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.8% compared with −9.6% at KLX Energy Services.
RPC pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; KLX Energy Services does not pay one.
RPC scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for KLX Energy Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KLXE | RES |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.2M | $1.3B |
| Share price | $1.28 | $5.77 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.7% | 4.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −67.8% | 44.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 1,548 | 2,893 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 68.1× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.9× (better) | 8.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 35.3× |
| FCF yield | −34.2% | 2.8% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $5.88 |
| Margin of safety | – | 1.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.4% | 17.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 22.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −167% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −174% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.3% | 23.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.6% (better) | −2.2% |
| Net margin | −9.6% | −1.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.4% | 2.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −3.0% |
| Return on invested capital | −4.2% | −3.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 494.75 | 0.02 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.51 (better) | −1.23 |
| Interest coverage | −0.2× (better) | −13.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.18 | 3.52 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.80 | 5.07 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.2% | 42.7% |
| Held by insiders | – | 82.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $153K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 38.2% |
Go deeper
- KLXE stock overview
- KLXE income statement
- KLXE valuation and score
- RES stock overview
- RES income statement
- RES valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.