KLX Energy Services vs Natural Gas Services
KLXE and NGS side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KLXE and NGS compare
Natural Gas Services is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as KLX Energy Services ($383M against $27.2M).
Natural Gas Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.2% versus 1.4% for KLX Energy Services).
Natural Gas Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.8% compared with −9.6% at KLX Energy Services.
Natural Gas Services pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; KLX Energy Services does not pay one.
Natural Gas Services scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 4 for KLX Energy Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KLXE | NGS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.2M | $383M |
| Share price | $1.28 | $29.70 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.7% | 0.00% |
| Change, 5 years | −67.8% | 173% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 1,548 | 259 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 18.8× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 1.8× |
| P/B | 68.1× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.9× (better) | 4.3× |
| FCF yield | −34.2% | −4.0% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $34.28 |
| Margin of safety | – | 13.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.4% | 24.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 20.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 8.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 6.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 62.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.3% | 59.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.6% | 21.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.6% | 9.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.4% (better) | −7.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 7.1% |
| Return on invested capital | −4.2% | 11.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 494.75 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.51 | – |
| Interest coverage | −0.2× | 2.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.18 | 2.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.80 | 1.42 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 32.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.2% | 87.8% |
| Held by insiders | – | 18.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $153K (better) | −$5.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- KLXE stock overview
- KLXE income statement
- KLXE valuation and score
- NGS stock overview
- NGS income statement
- NGS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.