Kodiak Gas Services vs Summit Midstream
KGS and SMC side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KGS and SMC compare
Kodiak Gas Services is the larger company, worth 7.2 times as much as Summit Midstream ($4.5B against $623M).
Summit Midstream grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.6% versus 14.5% for Kodiak Gas Services).
Kodiak Gas Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with 1.6% at Summit Midstream.
Kodiak Gas Services pays a dividend yielding 3.3%; Summit Midstream does not pay one.
Kodiak Gas Services scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Summit Midstream), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KGS | SMC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.5B | $623M |
| Share price | $44.69 | $30.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.4% | 34.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 2.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 1,300 | 296 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.1× | – |
| P/S | 3.1× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6× (better) | 9.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 24.5× |
| FCF yield | −0.78% | 4.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $57.10 | $51.98 |
| Margin of safety | 21.7% | 41.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.5% | 17.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 121% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 104% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.0% | 69.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 31.0% | – |
| Net margin | 11.3% (better) | 1.6% |
| FCF margin | −2.4% | 4.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 1.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 2.05 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.55 (better) | 5.50 |
| Current ratio | 1.31 (better) | 1.25 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.35 (better) | 0.41 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 112% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.74% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 27.8% |
| Held by insiders | 73.8% | 42.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$341M | $37.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 25.0% | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- KGS stock overview
- KGS income statement
- KGS valuation and score
- SMC stock overview
- SMC income statement
- SMC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.