StockData

Kinross Gold vs Pan American Silver

KGC and PAAS side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How KGC and PAAS compare

Kinross Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.9% versus 28.4% for Pan American Silver).

Kinross Gold scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for Pan American Silver), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricKGCPAAS
Size and price
Share price$20.13$37.98
Change, 1 year−12.9%8.2%
Change, 5 years224%46.1%
Beta (5Y)0.880.91
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)7
Valuation score00
Growth score4 (better)2
Performance score5 (better)1
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)36.9% (better)28.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average10.8%22.0% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)152%–
EPS growth (TTM)153%726% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average13.0%24.7% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin52.7% (better)38.8%
Operating margin46.5% (better)34.1%
Net margin33.9%–
FCF margin36.4% (better)28.2%
Return on equity31.0%–
Return on invested capital33.2% (better)17.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.09 (better)0.10
Net debt / EBITDA−0.23−0.29
Interest coverage25.0×411× (better)
Current ratio2.352.69 (better)
Piotroski F-score9–
Ownership
Held by institutions60.9%51.7%
Held by insiders0.00%0.00%
Superinvestors holding1–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.