Kinross Gold vs Newmont
KGC and NEM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KGC and NEM compare
Kinross Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.9% versus 23.7% for Newmont).
Newmont keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.7% compared with 33.9% at Kinross Gold.
Newmont pays a dividend yielding 0.96%; Kinross Gold does not pay one.
Newmont scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 14 for Kinross Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KGC | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $113B |
| Share price | $19.93 | $107.47 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.2% | 32.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 187% | 83.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.72 |
| Employees | – | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.5× |
| P/S | – | 4.3× |
| P/B | – | 3.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.9% |
| Fair value | – | $179.85 |
| Margin of safety | – | 40.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 36.9% (better) | 23.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.8% | 14.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 152% (better) | 28.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 153% (better) | 33.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.0% (better) | 12.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.7% | 69.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 46.5% | – |
| Net margin | 33.9% | 34.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 36.4% | 37.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 31.0% (better) | 26.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 33.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.09 (better) | 0.14 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.23 | −0.23 |
| Interest coverage | 25.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.35 | 2.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.82 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 | 9 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.96% |
| Payout ratio | – | 11.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −0.78% |
| Buyback yield | – | 5.0% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 6.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.9% | 79.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.11% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$13.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
Go deeper
- KGC stock overview
- KGC income statement
- KGC valuation and score
- NEM stock overview
- NEM income statement
- NEM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.