Kforce vs Robert Half
KFRC and RHI side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KFRC and RHI compare
Robert Half is the larger company, worth 4.3 times as much as Kforce ($4.3B against $1.0B).
On earnings, Kforce is cheaper: it trades at 23.4× trailing earnings, against 34.7× for Robert Half.
Kforce grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.1% versus −2.9% for Robert Half).
Kforce keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.0% compared with 2.3% at Robert Half.
Both pay dividends: Kforce yields 2.8% and Robert Half 5.6%.
Kforce scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 12 for Robert Half), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KFRC | RHI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.0B | $4.3B |
| Share price | $55.85 | $42.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 80.0% | 51.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.3% | −64.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 1,600 | 7,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.4× (better) | 34.7× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 7.3× | 3.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.9× (better) | 55.3× |
| P/FCF | 116× | 20.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.86% | 4.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $45.53 | $24.37 |
| Margin of safety | −22.7% (better) | −72.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.1% (better) | −2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.0% | 1.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 0.33% (better) | −21.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.8% (better) | −21.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −5.6% (better) | −13.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.8% | 37.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.5% (better) | 1.4% |
| Net margin | 3.0% (better) | 2.3% |
| FCF margin | 0.63% | 3.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 30.5% (better) | 9.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 32.4% (better) | 5.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.95 (better) | 1.48 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.88 (better) | 3.80 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | 5.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 65.9% | 196% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.3% (better) | 11.7% |
| Buyback yield | 2.5% (better) | 0.16% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% | 5.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.7% | 124% |
| Held by insiders | 7.5% | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$578K | $0 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.7% | 19.3% |
Go deeper
- KFRC stock overview
- KFRC income statement
- KFRC valuation and score
- RHI stock overview
- RHI income statement
- RHI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.