StockData

Kirby vs Viking

KEX and VIK side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How KEX and VIK compare

Viking grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.0% versus 8.5% for Kirby).

Viking keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.3% compared with 10.4% at Kirby.

Kirby scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Viking), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricKEXVIK
Size and price
Market cap$6.8B–
Share price$128.51$88.88
Change, 1 year16.1%48.0%
Change, 5 years135%–
Beta (5Y)0.961.17
Employees5,23313K
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)6
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score12 (better)
Health score6 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E18.5×–
P/S1.9×–
P/B2.0×–
EV/EBITDA9.9×–
P/FCF17.4×–
PEG0.40–
FCF yield5.7%–
Fair value$117.08–
Margin of safety−9.8%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)8.5%20.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average9.2%–
Net income growth (TTM)22.2%64.8% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)28.8%–
Profitability
Gross margin–43.2%
Operating margin14.2%23.3% (better)
Net margin10.4%19.3% (better)
FCF margin10.8%–
Return on equity11.0%–
Return on invested capital8.8%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.31–
Net debt / EBITDA1.301.01 (better)
Interest coverage11.7× (better)4.6×
Current ratio1.70 (better)0.81
Altman Z-score3.18–
Piotroski F-score78 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield4.8%–
Shareholder yield4.8%–
Ownership
Held by institutions101%47.7%
Held by insiders0.78%53.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$16.9M (better)−$43.7M
Short interest, % of float4.6%4.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.