Keel Infrastructure vs TeraWulf
KEEL and WULF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KEEL and WULF compare
Keel Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (72.0% versus 14.6% for TeraWulf).
Keel Infrastructure keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −124% compared with −1180% at TeraWulf.
Keel Infrastructure scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for TeraWulf), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KEEL | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $5.9B |
| Share price | $2.06 | $11.73 |
| Change, 1 year | −51.6% | −19.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.7% | −59.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.65 | 2.30 |
| Employees | 274 | 141 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 35.4× |
| P/B | – | 39.7× |
| FCF yield | – | −42.8% |
| Fair value | – | $1.88 |
| Margin of safety | – | −524% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 72.0% (better) | 14.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 45.9% | 65.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −8.2% | 40.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −65.2% (better) | −250% |
| Net margin | −124% (better) | −1180% |
| FCF margin | −143% (better) | −1516% |
| Return on equity | −60.6% (better) | −1212% |
| Return on invested capital | −19.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.12 | – |
| Interest coverage | −17.3× | −2.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 16.26 (better) | 0.75 |
| Altman Z-score | – | −0.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | −20.5% |
| Shareholder yield | – | −20.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 61.1% | 79.6% |
| Held by insiders | 4.5% | 20.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $526K (better) | −$35.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.0% | 30.2% |
Go deeper
- KEEL stock overview
- KEEL income statement
- KEEL valuation and score
- WULF stock overview
- WULF income statement
- WULF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.