Kimball Electronics vs OSI Systems
KE and OSIS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KE and OSIS compare
OSI Systems is the larger company, worth 6.4 times as much as Kimball Electronics ($3.0B against $473M).
On earnings, OSI Systems is cheaper: it trades at 20.7× trailing earnings, against 23.5× for Kimball Electronics.
OSI Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.9% versus −1.5% for Kimball Electronics).
OSI Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.8% compared with 1.4% at Kimball Electronics.
OSI Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Kimball Electronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KE | OSIS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $473M | $3.0B |
| Share price | $19.74 | $192.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −33.0% | −31.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.9% | 103% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 5,600 | 7,806 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.5× | 20.7× (better) |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1× (better) | 14.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.5× |
| PEG | – | 1.10 |
| FCF yield | −1.1% | 8.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $35.83 | $234.57 |
| Margin of safety | 44.9% (better) | 17.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% | 2.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | 9.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −14.2% | 4.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.6% | 5.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −12.8% | 17.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.2% | 32.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.4% | 12.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 8.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.35% | 14.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.5% | 18.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.6% | 12.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.40 (better) | 1.28 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.55 (better) | 2.67 |
| Interest coverage | 6.6× | 9.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.90 | 2.89 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.54 | 3.04 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.7% | 121% |
| Held by insiders | 2.5% | 6.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$10.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.6% | 13.1% |
Go deeper
- KE stock overview
- KE income statement
- KE valuation and score
- OSIS stock overview
- OSIS income statement
- OSIS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.