Johnson Outdoors vs YETI
JOUT and YETI side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JOUT and YETI compare
YETI is the larger company, worth 5.7 times as much as Johnson Outdoors ($2.9B against $501M).
Johnson Outdoors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.5% versus 6.9% for YETI).
YETI keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with −1.2% at Johnson Outdoors.
Johnson Outdoors pays a dividend yielding 2.8%; YETI does not pay one.
YETI scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 12 for Johnson Outdoors), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JOUT | YETI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $501M | $2.9B |
| Share price | $47.80 | $39.42 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.2% | 2.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −56.8% | −61.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 1.44 |
| Employees | 1,300 | 1,390 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 16.3× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 4.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.6× (better) | 9.6× |
| P/FCF | 16.8× | 12.3× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.64 |
| FCF yield | 6.0% | 8.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $45.77 | $41.21 |
| Margin of safety | −4.4% | 4.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.5% (better) | 6.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.06% | 11.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 14.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 26.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 2.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.7% | 59.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.7% | 12.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.2% | 9.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.5% | 11.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −1.8% | 27.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.2% | 29.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.01 |
| Interest coverage | 81.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.37 (better) | 1.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.79 | 6.05 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.02% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 63.6% | 117% |
| Held by insiders | 16.6% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.1M | −$442K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 11.3% |
Go deeper
- JOUT stock overview
- JOUT income statement
- JOUT valuation and score
- YETI stock overview
- YETI income statement
- YETI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.