Jones Lang LaSalle vs Newmark
JLL and NMRK side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JLL and NMRK compare
Jones Lang LaSalle is the larger company, worth 7.9 times as much as Newmark ($16.6B against $2.1B).
On earnings, Newmark is cheaper: it trades at 16.2× trailing earnings, against 17.2× for Jones Lang LaSalle.
Newmark grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.8% versus 11.2% for Jones Lang LaSalle).
Newmark pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Jones Lang LaSalle does not pay one.
Newmark scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 9 for Jones Lang LaSalle), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JLL | NMRK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.6B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $359.79 | $11.52 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.6% | −38.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 34.4% | −29.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 113K | 8,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.2× | 16.2× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× | 6.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 2.6× |
| PEG | 2.36 | 1.10 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | 38.2% |
| Fair value | $334.47 | $17.80 |
| Margin of safety | −7.6% | 35.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.2% | 20.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.5% | 11.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 49.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 79.3% (better) | 65.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.3% (better) | 11.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 4.7% | 7.7% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 4.1% |
| FCF margin | – | 22.1% |
| Return on equity | – | 10.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.7% (better) | 10.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 (better) | 0.60 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.30 (better) | 1.32 |
| Current ratio | 1.13 (better) | 1.09 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.48 (better) | 1.64 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 3.4% | 7.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% | 8.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.9% | 64.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.0% | 48.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$16.3M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 6.9% |
Go deeper
- JLL stock overview
- JLL income statement
- JLL valuation and score
- NMRK stock overview
- NMRK income statement
- NMRK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.