J&J Snack Foods vs Simply Good Foods
JJSF and SMPL side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JJSF and SMPL compare
J&J Snack Foods is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Simply Good Foods ($1.6B against $1.1B).
J&J Snack Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−4.7% versus −6.5% for Simply Good Foods).
J&J Snack Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.2% compared with −11.5% at Simply Good Foods.
J&J Snack Foods pays a dividend yielding 3.6%; Simply Good Foods does not pay one.
J&J Snack Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Simply Good Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JJSF | SMPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $87.74 | $12.65 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.5% | −33.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −39.3% | −67.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 1,800 | 282 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.7× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 17.8× | 7.0× (better) |
| PEG | 3.08 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.6% | 14.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $92.45 | $28.39 |
| Margin of safety | 5.1% | 55.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.7% (better) | −6.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.1% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −41.2% (better) | −250% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −39.4% (better) | −266% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.3% | 32.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.9% (better) | −13.2% |
| Net margin | 3.2% (better) | −11.5% |
| FCF margin | 6.0% | 11.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.3% (better) | −9.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% (better) | −7.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.24 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.26 | – |
| Interest coverage | 27.8× (better) | −8.4× |
| Current ratio | 2.34 | 5.57 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.49 (better) | 2.01 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 124% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.6% | 19.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 8.2% | 19.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.0% | 99.0% |
| Held by insiders | 20.8% | 10.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | $1.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 12.7% |
Go deeper
- JJSF stock overview
- JJSF income statement
- JJSF valuation and score
- SMPL stock overview
- SMPL income statement
- SMPL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.