J.Jill vs Tilly's
JILL and TLYS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JILL and TLYS compare
J.Jill is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Tilly's ($356M against $129M).
On earnings, J.Jill is cheaper: it trades at 13.4× trailing earnings, against 70.2× for Tilly's.
Tilly's grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.1% versus −2.2% for J.Jill).
J.Jill keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.6% compared with 0.34% at Tilly's.
J.Jill pays a dividend yielding 1.5%; Tilly's does not pay one.
J.Jill scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Tilly's), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JILL | TLYS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $356M | $129M |
| Share price | $23.96 | $4.21 |
| Change, 1 year | 55.6% | 173% |
| Change, 5 years | 22.4% | −73.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 3,140 | 3,809 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.4× (better) | 70.2× |
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.5× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.1× (better) | 6.6× |
| P/FCF | 7.3× (better) | 11.4× |
| FCF yield | 13.7% (better) | 8.8% |
| Fair value | $26.18 | $4.06 |
| Margin of safety | 8.5% (better) | −3.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.2% | 6.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.9% (better) | 0.82% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −26.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −25.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 70.0% (better) | 32.3% |
| Operating margin | 8.1% (better) | 0.13% |
| Net margin | 4.6% (better) | 0.34% |
| FCF margin | 8.3% (better) | 1.9% |
| Return on equity | 20.8% (better) | 2.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 31.8% (better) | 2.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.52 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.06 | – |
| Interest coverage | 5.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.30 (better) | 1.16 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.13 (better) | 1.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 18.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 50.2% | 71.4% |
| Held by insiders | 7.5% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$12.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.7% | – |
Go deeper
- JILL stock overview
- JILL income statement
- JILL valuation and score
- TLYS stock overview
- TLYS income statement
- TLYS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.