Aurora Mobile vs Similarweb
JG and SMWB side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JG and SMWB compare
Aurora Mobile grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.6% versus 13.1% for Similarweb).
Aurora Mobile keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.11% compared with −11.7% at Similarweb.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JG | SMWB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $5.27 | $7.97 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.9% | 1.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −82.1% | −59.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 1.28 |
| Employees | 421 | 1,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.6% (better) | 13.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 24.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.2% | 79.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.19% (better) | −8.3% |
| Net margin | 0.11% (better) | −11.7% |
| FCF margin | 17.2% (better) | 4.7% |
| Return on equity | 0.66% (better) | −130% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.08 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −222.66 | – |
| Interest coverage | 9.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.51% | – |
| Held by insiders | 42.4% | 27.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$133K (better) | −$15.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.95% |
Go deeper
- JG stock overview
- JG income statement
- JG valuation and score
- SMWB stock overview
- SMWB income statement
- SMWB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.