Aurora Mobile vs Sangoma Technologies
JG and SANG side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JG and SANG compare
Aurora Mobile grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.6% versus −15.5% for Sangoma Technologies).
Aurora Mobile scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Sangoma Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JG | SANG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $5.27 | $4.77 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.9% | −11.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −82.1% | −75.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 421 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.6% (better) | −15.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 8.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.2% | 70.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.19% | – |
| Net margin | 0.11% | – |
| FCF margin | 17.2% (better) | 11.0% |
| Return on equity | 0.66% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.08 (better) | 0.16 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −222.66 | – |
| Interest coverage | 9.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.73 | 0.78 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.51% | 23.4% |
| Held by insiders | 42.4% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$133K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.77% |
Go deeper
- JG stock overview
- JG income statement
- JG valuation and score
- SANG stock overview
- SANG income statement
- SANG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.