707 Cayman vs Tilly's
JEM and TLYS side by side, both in apparel and accessory stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JEM and TLYS compare
707 Cayman grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.9% versus 6.1% for Tilly's).
Tilly's keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.34% compared with −38.3% at 707 Cayman.
Tilly's scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for 707 Cayman), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JEM | TLYS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $129M |
| Share price | $2.52 | $4.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −96.4% | 206% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −74.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.74 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 17 | 3,809 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 70.3× |
| P/S | – | 0.2× |
| P/B | – | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.5× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.7% |
| Fair value | – | $4.01 |
| Margin of safety | – | −5.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.9% (better) | 6.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 0.82% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −649% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −603% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.9% | 32.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −37.5% | 0.13% (better) |
| Net margin | −38.3% | 0.34% (better) |
| FCF margin | −9.7% | 1.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −148% | 2.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2805% | 2.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −150.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.32 (better) | 1.16 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 71.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.83% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $165K (better) | −$12.8M |
Go deeper
- JEM stock overview
- JEM income statement
- JEM valuation and score
- TLYS stock overview
- TLYS income statement
- TLYS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.