707 Cayman vs Neo-Concept International
JEM and NCI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JEM and NCI compare
707 Cayman grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.9% versus −41.8% for Neo-Concept International).
Neo-Concept International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.24% compared with −38.3% at 707 Cayman.
Neo-Concept International scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for 707 Cayman), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JEM | NCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.52 | $5.36 |
| Change, 1 year | −96.4% | −92.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −99.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.74 | – |
| Employees | 17 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.9% (better) | −41.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −649% | −95.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −603% | −96.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.9% | 36.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −37.5% | 1.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −38.3% | 0.24% (better) |
| FCF margin | −9.7% | 12.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −148% | 0.41% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2805% | 1.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −5.59 |
| Interest coverage | −150.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.32 (better) | 4.29 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 3.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.83% | 74.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $165K | – |
Go deeper
- JEM stock overview
- JEM income statement
- JEM valuation and score
- NCI stock overview
- NCI income statement
- NCI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.