707 Cayman vs J-Long

JEM and JL side by side, both in apparel and accessory stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

jem707 Cayman$2.52−96.4% in 1 year

jlJ-Long$4.33−2.0% in 1 year

How JEM and JL compare

707 Cayman grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.9% versus 8.1% for J-Long).

J-Long keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.5% compared with −38.3% at 707 Cayman.

J-Long scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for 707 Cayman), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

Metric	JEM	JL
Size and price
Share price	$2.52	$4.33
Change, 1 year	−96.4%	−2.0%
Beta (5Y)	−0.74	−0.82
Employees	17	101
StockData Score
Total score	2	6 (better)
Valuation score	0	0
Growth score	1	2 (better)
Performance score	0	1 (better)
Health score	1	3 (better)
Dividend score	0	0
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)	21.9% (better)	8.1%
Net income growth (TTM)	−649%	6.6% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)	−603%	−6.3% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin	19.9%	34.0% (better)
Operating margin	−37.5%	7.0% (better)
Net margin	−38.3%	6.5% (better)
FCF margin	−9.7%	7.6% (better)
Return on equity	−148%	–
Return on invested capital	−2805%	–
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA	–	−3.98
Interest coverage	−150.7×	198× (better)
Current ratio	4.32 (better)	2.84
Piotroski F-score	4	6 (better)
Ownership
Held by insiders	0.83%	0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months	$165K	–
Short interest, % of float	–	0.18%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.