Jeld-Wen vs Louisiana-Pacific
JELD and LPX side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JELD and LPX compare
Louisiana-Pacific is the larger company, worth 65 times as much as Jeld-Wen ($5.3B against $81.2M).
Jeld-Wen grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.0% versus −14.3% for Louisiana-Pacific).
Louisiana-Pacific keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.2% compared with −5.3% at Jeld-Wen.
Louisiana-Pacific pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Jeld-Wen does not pay one.
Louisiana-Pacific scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Jeld-Wen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JELD | LPX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $81.2M | $5.3B |
| Share price | $0.936 | $75.85 |
| Change, 1 year | −57.5% | −2.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.3% | 8.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.82 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 14K | 4,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 96.0× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | – | 3.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.6× | 24.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | −150% | −0.40% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $34.82 |
| Margin of safety | – | −118% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.0% (better) | −14.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −5.4% | 2.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −81.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −81.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −14.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.5% | 18.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2.1% | 3.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.3% | 2.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.9% | −0.85% (better) |
| Return on equity | −454% | 3.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −4.5% | 2.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.20 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 23.93 | 0.53 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.9× | 4.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.82 | 3.22 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.19 | 5.85 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 150% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.0% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 4.2% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$385K (better) | −$13.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.7% | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- JELD stock overview
- JELD income statement
- JELD valuation and score
- LPX stock overview
- LPX income statement
- LPX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.