Sanfilippo John B & Son vs Simply Good Foods
JBSS and SMPL side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JBSS and SMPL compare
Simply Good Foods is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Sanfilippo John B & Son ($1.1B against $691M).
Sanfilippo John B & Son grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.1% versus −6.5% for Simply Good Foods).
Sanfilippo John B & Son keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.8% compared with −11.5% at Simply Good Foods.
Sanfilippo John B & Son pays a dividend yielding 7.6%; Simply Good Foods does not pay one.
Sanfilippo John B & Son scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 8 for Simply Good Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JBSS | SMPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $691M | $1.1B |
| Share price | $59.06 | $12.57 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.7% | −35.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.8% | −67.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.33 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 1,770 | 282 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.9× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 22.7× | 7.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.4% | 14.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $89.86 | $28.37 |
| Margin of safety | 34.3% | 55.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.1% (better) | −6.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −14.6% (better) | −250% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −14.9% (better) | −266% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.35% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.7% | 32.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.0% (better) | −13.2% |
| Net margin | 4.8% (better) | −11.5% |
| FCF margin | 2.6% | 11.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.4% (better) | −9.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 15.0% (better) | −7.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.13 (better) | 0.24 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.43 | – |
| Interest coverage | 38.3× (better) | −8.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.96 | 5.57 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.27 (better) | 2.00 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 93.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −4.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 19.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.6% | 19.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.1% | 99.0% |
| Held by insiders | 20.2% | 10.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.4M | $1.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 12.7% |
Go deeper
- JBSS stock overview
- JBSS income statement
- JBSS valuation and score
- SMPL stock overview
- SMPL income statement
- SMPL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.