Sanfilippo John B & Son vs Seneca Foods
JBSS and SENEA side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JBSS and SENEA compare
Seneca Foods is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Sanfilippo John B & Son ($1.2B against $691M).
On earnings, Seneca Foods is cheaper: it trades at 10.2× trailing earnings, against 12.4× for Sanfilippo John B & Son.
Seneca Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.1% versus 3.1% for Sanfilippo John B & Son).
Seneca Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.6% compared with 4.8% at Sanfilippo John B & Son.
Sanfilippo John B & Son pays a dividend yielding 7.6%; Seneca Foods does not pay one.
Sanfilippo John B & Son scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 19 for Seneca Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JBSS | SENEA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $691M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $59.06 | $176.47 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.7% | 49.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.8% | 288% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.33 | 0.30 |
| Employees | 1,770 | 2,995 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 19 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.4× | 10.2× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× | 6.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.7× | 7.4× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.07 |
| FCF yield | 4.4% | 13.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $89.86 | $283.74 |
| Margin of safety | 34.3% | 37.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.1% | 12.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% (better) | 2.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −14.6% | 98.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −14.9% | 101% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.35% | 3.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.7% (better) | 13.2% |
| Operating margin | 7.0% | 8.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.8% | 6.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.6% | 9.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.4% | 16.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 15.0% | 15.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.13 | 0.02 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.43 | 0.02 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 38.3× (better) | 11.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.96 | 2.60 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.27 (better) | 4.19 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 93.4% | 0.02% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −4.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.6% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.1% | 60.9% |
| Held by insiders | 20.2% | 5.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.4M | −$323K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | – |
Go deeper
- JBSS stock overview
- JBSS income statement
- JBSS valuation and score
- SENEA stock overview
- SENEA income statement
- SENEA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.