StockData

Jazz Pharmaceuticals vs BeOne Medicines

JAZZ and ONC side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How JAZZ and ONC compare

BeOne Medicines is the larger company, worth 39 times as much as Jazz Pharmaceuticals ($547B against $14.0B).

On earnings, Jazz Pharmaceuticals is cheaper: it trades at 14.8× trailing earnings, against 861× for BeOne Medicines.

BeOne Medicines grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (34.3% versus 12.6% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals).

Jazz Pharmaceuticals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.4% compared with 10.7% at BeOne Medicines.

BeOne Medicines scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Jazz Pharmaceuticals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricJAZZONC
Size and price
Market cap$14.0B$547B
Share price$215.98$370.33
Change, 1 year59.1%17.6%
Change, 5 years59.9%1.5%
Beta (5Y)0.551.07
Employees2,89012K
StockData Score
Total score1112 (better)
Valuation score4 (better)0
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score44
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E14.8× (better)861×
P/S3.0× (better)89.3×
P/B2.9× (better)106×
EV/EBITDA18.0× (better)504×
P/FCF8.8× (better)412×
FCF yield11.4% (better)0.24%
Fair value$254.92$15.35
Margin of safety15.3% (better)−2313%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)12.6%34.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average12.5%76.8% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin–88.9%
Operating margin19.5% (better)15.1%
Net margin20.4% (better)10.7%
FCF margin34.6% (better)21.7%
Return on equity22.1% (better)14.7%
Return on invested capital12.1%43.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.910.22 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA2.40 (better)−3.67
Interest coverage–8.7×
Current ratio1.783.40 (better)
Altman Z-score2.3582.54 (better)
Piotroski F-score47 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions99.2%2.4%
Held by insiders3.4%13.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$68.0M (better)−$369M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float8.7%–

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.