JAKKS Pacific vs Mattel
JAKK and MAT side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JAKK and MAT compare
Mattel is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as JAKKS Pacific ($4.6B against $423M).
On earnings, Mattel is cheaper: it trades at 9.4× trailing earnings, against 17.2× for JAKKS Pacific.
JAKKS Pacific grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.2% versus 6.4% for Mattel).
Mattel keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.0% compared with 4.2% at JAKKS Pacific.
JAKKS Pacific pays a dividend yielding 2.7%; Mattel does not pay one.
Mattel scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for JAKKS Pacific), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JAKK | MAT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $423M | $4.6B |
| Share price | $36.76 | $16.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 116% | −16.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 236% | −29.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.22 | 0.95 |
| Employees | 652 | 31K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.2× | 9.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.8× | 9.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.8× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.31 |
| FCF yield | 8.4% | – |
| Fair value | $24.92 | $23.45 |
| Margin of safety | −47.5% | 31.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.2% (better) | 6.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −26.2% | 3.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 330% (better) | 16.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 304% (better) | 27.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 28.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% | 49.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 9.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.2% | 9.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.7% | – |
| Return on equity | 9.8% | 21.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% | 11.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.52 |
| Interest coverage | 94.5× (better) | 4.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.67 | 1.98 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.62 | 2.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Payout ratio | 43.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 10.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | 10.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 59.9% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 21.3% | 18.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $422K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 12.0% |
Go deeper
- JAKK stock overview
- JAKK income statement
- JAKK valuation and score
- MAT stock overview
- MAT income statement
- MAT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.