Jack in the Box vs Papa Johns International
JACK and PZZA side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JACK and PZZA compare
Jack in the Box is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Papa Johns International ($1.1B against $608M).
On earnings, Jack in the Box is cheaper: it trades at 7.5× trailing earnings, against 23.4× for Papa Johns International.
Jack in the Box grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.3% versus −5.6% for Papa Johns International).
Jack in the Box keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with 1.4% at Papa Johns International.
Papa Johns International pays a dividend yielding 7.5%; Jack in the Box does not pay one.
Papa Johns International scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Jack in the Box), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JACK | PZZA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $608M |
| Share price | $13.02 | $18.45 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.8% | −64.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −87.3% | −86.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.14 | 1.03 |
| Employees | 5,046 | 9,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.5× (better) | 23.4× |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 181× | 7.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 37.7× | 17.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 5.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $37.92 | $33.82 |
| Margin of safety | 65.7% (better) | 45.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.3% (better) | −5.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.5% (better) | 2.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −63.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −65.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −6.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 28.7% |
| Operating margin | −3.5% | 4.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.4% (better) | 1.4% |
| FCF margin | 2.0% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on invested capital | −6.4% | 21.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 102.70 | 3.96 (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.58 | 0.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.12 | 3.35 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 7.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 0.00% | 223% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −6.0% | 15.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −0.00% | 7.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 24.2% | 114% |
| Held by insiders | 7.4% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$591K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.2% | 20.7% |
Go deeper
- JACK stock overview
- JACK income statement
- JACK valuation and score
- PZZA stock overview
- PZZA income statement
- PZZA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.