Jacobs Solutions vs KBR
J and KBR side by side, both in heavy construction other than building construction contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How J and KBR compare
Jacobs Solutions is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as KBR ($17.9B against $4.9B).
On earnings, KBR is cheaper: it trades at 11.1× trailing earnings, against 51.8× for Jacobs Solutions.
Jacobs Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.1% versus −2.4% for KBR).
KBR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with 2.4% at Jacobs Solutions.
Both pay dividends: Jacobs Solutions yields 0.92% and KBR 1.7%.
KBR scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 7 for Jacobs Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | J | KBR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.9B | $4.9B |
| Share price | $152.76 | $38.70 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.5% | −9.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 7.1% | −10.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 43K | 36K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 51.8× | 11.1× (better) |
| P/S | 1.3× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 5.5× | 2.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 27.5× | 7.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 27.7× | 14.9× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.30 |
| FCF yield | 3.6% | 6.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $99.30 | $87.26 |
| Margin of safety | −53.8% | 55.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.1% (better) | −2.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.4% | 6.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.3% | 16.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −26.4% | 19.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.1% (better) | 14.7% |
| Operating margin | 4.6% | 9.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.4% | 5.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.5% (better) | 4.2% |
| Return on equity | 9.6% | 27.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.7% | 15.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.10 (better) | 1.44 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.26 | 2.35 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.9× | 5.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.29 (better) | 0.94 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.89 (better) | 2.38 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.92% | 1.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 47.8% | 19.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 10.5% |
| Buyback yield | 3.8% (better) | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.7% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.2% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 0.63% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.9M | $945K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 8.3% |
Go deeper
- J stock overview
- J income statement
- J valuation and score
- KBR stock overview
- KBR income statement
- KBR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.