StockData

Iveda Solutions vs Safe Pro

IVDA and SPAI side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IVDA and SPAI compare

Safe Pro is the larger company, worth 22 times as much as Iveda Solutions ($56.4M against $2.5M).

Safe Pro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (92.6% versus −36.0% for Iveda Solutions).

Iveda Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −69.2% compared with −500% at Safe Pro.

Iveda Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Safe Pro), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIVDASPAI
Size and price
Market cap$2.5M$56.4M
Share price$0.201$2.77
Change, 1 year−76.5%−42.8%
Change, 5 years−99.7%–
Beta (5Y)0.573.28
Employees715
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)5
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score23 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.6× (better)19.6×
P/B0.5× (better)4.7×
FCF yield–−14.9%
Fair value$0.933$2.53
Margin of safety78.4% (better)−9.4%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−36.0%92.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average28.9%–
Profitability
Gross margin32.2%62.2% (better)
Operating margin−68.5% (better)−514%
Net margin−69.2% (better)−500%
FCF margin–−292%
Return on equity−91.9% (better)−198%
Return on invested capital−226% (better)−617%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.120.01 (better)
Interest coverage−102.7× (better)−1176.3×
Current ratio5.198.76 (better)
Altman Z-score−10.5115.71 (better)
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−262%–
Shareholder yield−262%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions10.3%10.3%
Held by insiders34.4%28.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$4.0M
Short interest, % of float–4.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.