StockData

IT Tech Packaging vs Ranpak

ITP and PACK side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ITP and PACK compare

Ranpak is the larger company, worth 292 times as much as IT Tech Packaging ($305M against $1.0M).

Ranpak grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.3% versus −0.28% for IT Tech Packaging).

Ranpak keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −8.3% compared with −13.9% at IT Tech Packaging.

IT Tech Packaging scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Ranpak), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricITPPACK
Size and price
Market cap$1.0M$305M
Share price$0.061$3.55
Change, 1 year−76.2%−29.0%
Change, 5 years−98.4%−91.6%
Beta (5Y)0.352.02
Employees383800
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)6
Valuation score4 (better)3
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0× (better)0.7×
P/B0.0× (better)0.6×
EV/EBITDA0.6× (better)14.9×
P/FCF0.3×–
FCF yield366%–
Fair value$2.69$4.17
Margin of safety97.7% (better)14.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−0.28%8.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−8.4%5.8% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin5.7%33.8% (better)
Operating margin−12.6%−1.7% (better)
Net margin−13.9%−8.3% (better)
FCF margin4.8%–
Return on equity−6.9%−6.6% (better)
Return on invested capital−4.8%−0.64% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.06 (better)0.79
Net debt / EBITDA0.38 (better)8.01
Interest coverage−16.6×−0.2× (better)
Current ratio1.92 (better)1.79
Altman Z-score0.94 (better)0.48
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions4.9%89.9%
Held by insiders0.00%45.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$18.7K
Short interest, % of float2.2%4.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.