StockData

Ideal Power vs Sealsq

IPWR and LAES side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IPWR and LAES compare

Ideal Power grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (57.2% versus −99.8% for Sealsq).

Ideal Power keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −39283% compared with −136776% at Sealsq.

Ideal Power scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for Sealsq), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIPWRLAES
Size and price
Market cap$37.3M–
Share price$2.27$1.42
Change, 1 year−55.0%−76.2%
Change, 5 years−85.9%–
Beta (5Y)1.601.83
Employees17185
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)3
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score00
Health score6 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1233×–
P/B0.9×–
FCF yield−25.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)57.2% (better)−99.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−38.5% (better)−71.9%
Profitability
Gross margin0.57%34520% (better)
Operating margin−40605% (better)−159196%
Net margin−39283% (better)−136776%
FCF margin−31119% (better)−128000%
Return on equity−43.0%−10.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−691%−97.4% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00 (better)
Interest coverage–−593.8×
Current ratio27.86 (better)14.43
Altman Z-score4.97–
Piotroski F-score14 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−108%–
Shareholder yield−108%–
Ownership
Held by institutions38.7%6.4%
Held by insiders5.3%0.80%
Insider net buying, 12 months$290K (better)−$1.2M
Short interest, % of float2.6%3.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.