IP Strategy vs Willamette Valley Vineyards
IPST and WVVI side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IPST and WVVI compare
Willamette Valley Vineyards is the larger company, worth 4.0 times as much as IP Strategy ($8.3M against $2.1M).
IP Strategy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.7% versus −1.6% for Willamette Valley Vineyards).
Willamette Valley Vineyards keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5.9% compared with −2064% at IP Strategy.
IP Strategy scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Willamette Valley Vineyards), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IPST | WVVI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.1M | $8.3M |
| Share price | $2.10 | $1.66 |
| Change, 1 year | −99.1% | −36.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −88.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.24 |
| Employees | 21 | 158 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.2× |
| P/B | 0.1× (better) | 0.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 101× |
| P/FCF | – | 13.2× |
| FCF yield | −801% | 7.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $36.27 | $16.36 |
| Margin of safety | 94.2% (better) | 89.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 39.7% (better) | −1.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 6.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 65.4% (better) | 59.1% |
| Operating margin | −2029% | −7.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −2064% | −5.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −165% | 1.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −2713% | −3.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2257% | −2.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.22 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 63.19 |
| Interest coverage | – | −2.6× |
| Current ratio | 0.31 | 2.92 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −36.70 | 0.83 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.5% | 11.0% |
| Held by insiders | – | 27.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $90.2K |
Go deeper
- IPST stock overview
- IPST income statement
- IPST valuation and score
- WVVI stock overview
- WVVI income statement
- WVVI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.