StockData

Intrepid Potash vs Energy Fuels

IPI and UUUU side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IPI and UUUU compare

Energy Fuels is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Intrepid Potash ($1.7B against $444M).

Intrepid Potash keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.0% compared with −100.0% at Energy Fuels.

Intrepid Potash scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Energy Fuels), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIPIUUUU
Size and price
Market cap$444M$1.7B
Share price$32.97$6.93
Change, 1 year25.5%−58.0%
Change, 5 years−19.7%−24.5%
Beta (5Y)0.771.62
Employees4781,069
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)6
Valuation score4 (better)1
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E18.0×–
P/S1.5× (better)14.8×
P/B0.9× (better)1.8×
EV/EBITDA5.4×–
P/FCF17.4×–
FCF yield5.8%–
Fair value$43.01$8.66
Margin of safety23.3% (better)19.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)–48.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–109%
Profitability
Gross margin21.1%47.9% (better)
Operating margin4.2% (better)−81.0%
Net margin8.0% (better)−100.0%
FCF margin8.5%–
Return on equity4.8% (better)−14.1%
Return on invested capital3.2% (better)−10.2%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00 (better)
Interest coverage503× (better)−10.2×
Current ratio5.9620.49 (better)
Altman Z-score2.65 (better)1.43
Piotroski F-score8 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions64.7%72.4%
Held by insiders21.7%1.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$217K (better)−$1.8M
Short interest, % of float4.2%23.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.