IPG Photonics vs Kulicke & Soffa Industries
IPGP and KLIC side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IPGP and KLIC compare
Kulicke & Soffa Industries is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as IPG Photonics ($3.8B against $3.0B).
On earnings, Kulicke & Soffa Industries is cheaper: it trades at 33.7× trailing earnings, against 109× for IPG Photonics.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.4% versus 13.0% for IPG Photonics).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.2% compared with 2.6% at IPG Photonics.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; IPG Photonics does not pay one.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for IPG Photonics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IPGP | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $3.8B |
| Share price | $70.81 | $73.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.2% | 86.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −56.8% | 28.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 1.53 |
| Employees | 4,840 | 2,551 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 109× | 33.7× (better) |
| P/S | 2.8× (better) | 4.0× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 4.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.5× | 23.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 145× | 93.1× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.69% | 1.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $36.64 | $64.48 |
| Margin of safety | −93.3% | −13.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.0% | 44.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.5% | 0.97% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 1845% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 2613% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −24.5% (better) | −65.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.4% | 48.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.75% | 13.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 12.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.9% | 4.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.3% | 13.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.45% | 29.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 837× |
| Current ratio | 6.18 (better) | 3.44 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.67 | 8.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.3% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.64% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.4% | 92.7% |
| Held by insiders | 69.9% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$63.4M | −$18.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 28.6% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- IPGP stock overview
- IPGP income statement
- IPGP valuation and score
- KLIC stock overview
- KLIC income statement
- KLIC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.