Interparfums vs Yatsen
IPAR and YSG side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IPAR and YSG compare
Yatsen grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.7% versus 2.6% for Interparfums).
Interparfums keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with −1.9% at Yatsen.
Interparfums pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Yatsen does not pay one.
Interparfums scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 8 for Yatsen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IPAR | YSG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.3B | – |
| Share price | $133.19 | $1.92 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.0% | −71.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 43.9% | −87.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 662 | 1,505 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.1× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× | – |
| P/B | 4.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 17.5× | – |
| PEG | 2.18 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.7% | – |
| Fair value | $138.78 | – |
| Margin of safety | 4.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 26.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.5% (better) | −3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 3.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 34.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.8% | 78.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.9% (better) | −4.3% |
| Net margin | 11.3% (better) | −1.9% |
| FCF margin | 16.2% (better) | −3.2% |
| Return on equity | 19.5% (better) | −2.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 20.8% (better) | −7.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.29 | – |
| Interest coverage | 44.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.33 | 3.63 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.26 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 60.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 57.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.24% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.1% | 0.34% |
| Held by insiders | 22.3% | 25.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.0M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.8% | – |
Go deeper
- IPAR stock overview
- IPAR income statement
- IPAR valuation and score
- YSG stock overview
- YSG income statement
- YSG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.