Innospec vs Solstice Advanced Materials
IOSP and SOLS side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IOSP and SOLS compare
Solstice Advanced Materials is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Innospec ($9.6B against $2.5B).
Solstice Advanced Materials grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.2% versus 2.9% for Innospec).
Both pay dividends: Innospec yields 1.8% and Solstice Advanced Materials 0.37%.
Innospec scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Solstice Advanced Materials), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IOSP | SOLS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5B | $9.6B |
| Share price | $99.89 | $60.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 35.9% | 22.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 6.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | – |
| Employees | 2,450 | 4,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.3× |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 6.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.0× | – |
| P/FCF | – | 49.3× |
| FCF yield | – | 2.0% |
| Fair value | $95.48 | $33.30 |
| Margin of safety | −4.6% (better) | −81.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.9% | 9.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −59.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 32.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.5% | 30.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.0% | – |
| Net margin | – | 5.1% |
| FCF margin | – | 4.8% |
| Return on equity | – | 8.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.24 (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.78 (better) | 1.46 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.50 (better) | 2.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.8% (better) | 0.37% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.98% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.37% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 84.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 0.04% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$877K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- IOSP stock overview
- IOSP income statement
- IOSP valuation and score
- SOLS stock overview
- SOLS income statement
- SOLS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.